Should Ezekiel Elliott Have Won Rookie of the Year Over Dak Prescott?

 

There’s no denying the fact that both Ezekiel Elliott and Dak Prescott made a huge difference in this year’s season for the Dallas Cowboys. Not even Jerry Jones predicted the fact that two rookies would take them to the first place in the NFC and/or playoffs.

When NFL Honors came out a few days ago, Prescott ended up winning Offensive Rookie of the Year in the NFC and Elliott only got Ground Player of the Year.

Some argued all year that Ezekiel was the Cowboys best player and should be considered for both MVP and Rookie of the Year honors. He actually finished third in MVP voting, yet lost the award to his teammate Dak, though he was considered a more valuable piece.

Skip Bayless, Shannon Sharpe and Nelly argued the question on UNDISPUTED earlier, with Skip saying Dak was the real MVP and Nelly saying without the running back or offensive line, Dak wouldn’t have excelled as much.

What do you think? Leave your opinion in the comments.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s